A DECADE AGO I WROTE an article entitled Technology as play in which I called for early childhood educators to rethink the way in which they regard play. This involved not only incorporating the notion of playing with new technologies but also critiqued the essence of what constituted play and the link with learning that was viewed uncritically. Here, I review and update this discussion, revisit the literature about how play is conceptualised and suggest that, while play is an essential component of exemplary early childhood experiences, it needs to be related to new technologies and pedagogical practices that are designed to support learning in diverse ways, rather than being regarded as the only catalyst for learning that occurs automatically in all types of play contexts.
DrakeJ. (2005). Planning children's play and learning in the foundation stage.London, UK: David Fulton.
8.
FleerM. (2009). A cultural-historical perspective on play: Play as a leading activity across cultural communities. In Pramling-SamuelssonI. & FleerM. (Eds). Play and learning in early childhood settings. (pp 1–17). Netherlands: Springer.
9.
Gonzales-MenaJ. (2008). Foundations of early childhood education.Boston, USA: McGraw Hill.
10.
HendrickJ. & WeissmanP. (2006). The whole child.Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
11.
Justus SussD. (2005). Supporting play: Birth through eight.Clifton Park, NY: Delmar.
12.
KlugmanE. (1995). Play, policy and Practice.St. Paul, Minnesota: Redleaf.
13.
KressG. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking paths to literacy.London: Routledge.
14.
LukeA. (2006). Foreword. In PahlK. & RowsellJ. (Eds) Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom (pp. x–xiv). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
15.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzalesN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice31(2): 132–141.
16.
MoylesJ. (Ed) (2007). Early years foundations: Meeting the challenges.Maidenhead, UK: OUP.
17.
PahlK., & RowsellJ. (Eds). (2006). Travel notes from the new literacy studies: Instances of Practice.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) (2000). Curriculum guidelines for the foundation stage.London: QCA.
20.
RideoutV. J., FoehrU. G., & RobertsD. F. (2010). Generation M2 Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year olds. The Henry Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved 21 May 2009 from www.kff.org
21.
RideoutV., RobertsD.F. & FoehrM. A. (2005) Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–8 year olds. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved 21 May 2009 from www.kff.org
22.
Sutton SmithB. (1997). The ambiguity of play.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
US Department of Education (2000). No child left behind.Jessup, MD: Educational Publications Center.
24.
YellandN. J. (2007). Shift to the future: Rethinking learning with new technologies in education.New York: Routledge.
25.
YellandN. J. (1999). Technology as Play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 26(4), 217–220.
26.
YellandN. J., & LeungW. M. (2009). Digital explorations for knowledge building and extending the creative capacities of students. Arts in Society, 4 (2). 257–265.
27.
YellandN. J., O'Rourke, LeeL., & HarrisonC. (2008). Rethinking learning in early childhood education.Buckingham, UK: OUP