The post-1994 higher education dispensation has witnessed an increase in the number of institutional stakeholder groups striving to become members of university councils within their particular contexts. As such, they are constantly becoming coalitions of powerful constituencies who seek to influence the running of the council to satisfy stakeholder demands across the university and beyond. Consequently, there is a concern whether institutional stakeholder moves to become a part of the council and is bound to improving governance practices in the universities. This article argues that at the level of the university councils, the institutional strategies, policies and articulation with its different stakeholder groups are critical, using data obtained through the use of documentary sources, interviews and surveys. The results show that institutional stakeholders have strong inclinations towards the governance mechanisms of how individuals become members of the university council, calling for greater professionalization of the governance best practises for improving governance in strongly stakeholder-governed university councils and pointing out possible areas of further research.
AGB. (2006). The leadership imperative: Report of the AGB task force on the state of the Presidency in American higher education. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Universties and Colleges.
2.
AsmalK. (2002). Statement on the transformation and reconstruction of higher education systems. Pretoria: MoE.
BennettB. (2002). The new style borads of governors—Are they working?Higher Education Quaterly, 56(3).
5.
BlaseJ. (1998). The micropolitics of education change. In HargreavesA.LiebermanA.FullanM.HopkinsD. (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 544–557). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6.
BourdieuP. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BuchananD.BadhamR. (2004). Power, politics and oragnisational change: Winning the Turf game. London: SAGE Publication.
8.
BuntingI.CloeteN. (2010). Institutional types in higher education (pp. 1–25). Pretoria: Centre for higher education ransformation.
9.
ChaitR. P.RyanW. P.TaylorB. E. (2005). Governance as leadership: Reframing the work of nonprofit boards. Hoboken: John Wiley.
10.
CHE. (2000). Towards a new higher education landscape. In CHE
(Ed.), Report to the Minister of Education. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.
11.
CHE. (2004). South African higher education in the first decade of democracy (pp. 175–185). Pretoria: CHE.
12.
CloeteN.MaassenP. (2002). In the limits of policy. In CloeteN.MaassenP.FehnelR.MojaT.GibbonT.PeroldH. (Eds.), Transformation higher education: Global pressures and local realities in South Africa (pp. 7–33). Cape Town: Juta.
13.
CorbettaP. (2003). Social research theory, methods and techniques. London: SAGE Publication.
14.
CornforthC. (2003). The governance of public and non-profit organizations: What do boards do?New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CrossM.NaidooD. (2011). Peer and the dilemmas of quality control in programme accreditation in South African higher education: Challenges and possibilities. Higher Education Policy, 24, 517–534. doi: 10.1057/hep.2011.13
16.
Department of Education. (1997). Education White Paper 3: A programme for higher education transformation. Government Gazette, 386(18207). Pretoria: Government Printers.
17.
Department of Education. (1998). An investigation conducted at the University of Transkei. Report by Advocate T. L. Skweyiya S.C. (Appointed as Independent Assessor in terms of Sections 44 and 45 of the Higher Education Act, No. 101 of 1997). Government Gazette, 19501, 20November1998. Pretoria: Government Printers.
18.
Department of Education. (1999). Investigation conducted at the University of Fort Hare, Report to the Minister of Education, the Honourable S. M. E. Bengu by Emeritus Professor S. J. Saunders. Government Gazette, 19842, 12 March 1999. Pretoria: Government Printers.
19.
Department of Education. (2000a). Creating comprehensive universities in South Africa: A concept document (Commissioned Report by Trish Gibbon). Pretoria.
20.
Department of Education. (2000b). Investigation into the affairs of the University of the North by the Independent Assessor [Professor T. Nhlapo] appointed by the Minister of Education in terms of Chapter 6 of the Higher Education Act, No. 101 of 1997. Government Gazette, 21654, 10 October 2000. Pretoria: Government Printers.
21.
Department of Education. (2011). Investigation conducted at the University of Kwa-Zulu Natal. The outcomes of the independent assessor’s report on the Vaal University of Technology by Prof De Beer appointed by the Minister of Education in terms of Chapter 6 of the Higher Education Act, No. 101 of 1997. Pretoria: DoE.
22.
FoucaultM. (1991). Governmentality. In BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality (pp. 87–105). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
24.
GreenM.EckelP. (2001). On Change IV – What Governing Boards Need to Know and Do About Institutional Change. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
HallM.SymesA.LuescherT. M. (2002). Governance in South African higher education (Research Report Prepared for the Council in Higher Education, pp 1–70). Pretoria: CHE.
27.
KielG. (2010). Challenges for university councils. Paper presented at the Paper Delivered to national conference on university governance, Melbourne.
28.
KulatiT. (2000). Governance, leadership and institutional change in South African higher education: Grappling with instability. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(3), 177–192.
29.
Ministry of Education. (1996). Framework for transformation of higher education in South Africa (National Stakeholder Meeting, pp. 120–149). Pretoria.
30.
MojaT.HaywardF. (2000). Higher education policy development in contemporary South Africa. Higher Education Policy, 13(4), 335–359.
31.
MwiriaK. (2003). University governance and university-state relations. In TeferraD.AltbachP. G. (Eds.), African higher education: An international reference handbook (pp. 32–45). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
32.
National Commission for Higher Education. (1996). Higher education: A framework for transformation. Pretoria: Pretoria Department of Education.
33.
O’LearyZ. (2005). Researching real-world problems: A guide to methods of inquiry. London: SAGE Publication.
34.
OlssenM.PetersM. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
35.
PayneG.PayneJ. (2004). Key concepts in social research. London: SAGE Publication.
36.
PunchK. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publication.
37.
PusserB.OrdorikaI. (2001). Bringing political theory to university governance. Higher education handbook of theory and research, 16(20), 147–194.
38.
RousseauJ. J. (2002). The social contract and the first and second discourses (DunnD., Ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1755.)
39.
ShattockM. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
40.
StromquistN. P.MonkmanK. (2000). Defining globalization and assessing its implications on knowledge and education. In StromquistN. P. (Ed.), Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures (pp. 2–26). Oxford, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Inc.
41.
The South African Higher Education Statue. (1997). Higher Education Act 101 of 1997 (Assented To: 26 November 1997, pp. 1–55). Pretoria: Ministry of Education.
42.
University of Venda. (2011). The standard leaflet for the governance and management of the university council for the University of Venda (pp. 1–50).
43.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.
