From Legal Recognition to Lived Reality: A Review of Transgender Healthcare in Post-2019 India

Abstract

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, was introduced in India to safeguard the rights and dignity of transgender individuals in healthcare, education and employment. While the Act marks an important legislative milestone, its implementation has revealed limitations, particularly in healthcare. A key concern is the limited provision of gender-affirming care, which remains fragmented across regions. This review article synthesises academic literature from the past decade, including peer-reviewed articles, policy documents and empirical studies, with a focus on research published after the 2019 legislation. The review identifies barriers hindering equitable healthcare access for transgender individuals, including a shortage of trained medical professionals who can provide competent care, insufficient healthcare infrastructure for specialised treatments, and the absence of standardised clinical guidelines for gender-affirming procedures. The analysis highlights regional disparities, with urban centres offering better services compared to rural and semi-urban areas, where healthcare resources remain scarce. By examining these gaps, the article argues for strengthening policy frameworks, enhancing professional training and ensuring consistent healthcare delivery. It also suggests future pathways for research and reform aimed at building an inclusive healthcare system that upholds the rights promised under the Act.

Keywords

Transgender healthcare gender-affirming care healthcare regional disparities cultural competence

Introduction

Transgender people represent one of the most marginalised and underserved populations globally, particularly in terms of healthcare. Individuals whose gender identity is not the same as the sex they are assigned at birth often pursue gender-affirming care. This care typically involves hormone replacement therapy, surgeries to affirm their gender and psychological support, all aimed at helping their physical appearance reflect their gender identity. Access to such healthcare services is crucial for improving the well-being of transgender individuals, alleviating gender dysphoria, reducing mental health challenges such as depression and anxiety, and enhancing overall quality of life.

Despite the recent prominent discussions on transgender rights globally, transgender healthcare has faced persistent barriers, including discrimination, limited awareness among healthcare providers and inadequate policy frameworks to ensure access to gender-affirming services (Costa et al., 2016; Johnson et al., 2019). Such discrimination is explicitly practised in countries where the healthcare system is controlled by deep-rooted social norms and structural inequalities. In India, where societal norms are entrenched in traditional gender roles and heteronormative ideals, transgender individuals encounter even more pronounced obstacles in accessing basic healthcare services, let alone care that affirms their gender identity. Despite the historical recognition of transgender identities, such as Hijra or Aravani, within Indian culture, this acknowledgement has not resulted in equitable healthcare access. Instead, transgender people continue to face marginalisation, social exclusion and the denial of essential rights, including healthcare access.

For decades, transgender individuals in India have struggled to obtain medical care due to pervasive stigma, discrimination and a lack of understanding of their unique healthcare needs. The situation began to shift in 2014 with the landmark National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India judgment, in which the Supreme Court recognised transgender individuals as a ‘third gender’ and mandated their inclusion in public welfare programmes. Despite this legal progress, significant gaps remained in the provision of transgender-specific healthcare services.

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, marked another pivotal moment for transgender rights in India. The Act aimed to protect transgender individuals from discrimination and promote their inclusion in healthcare, employment and education. Specifically, the Act required healthcare institutions to provide equal, inclusive services, including gender-affirming care. While this legislation represented a step forward, its practical implementation has encountered numerous obstacles, resulting in ongoing challenges for transgender individuals in accessing adequate healthcare.

Within this context, this review critically examines the state of transgender healthcare in India, focusing on the period following the enactment of the Transgender Persons Act, 2019. It seeks to address the research gap concerning the real-world implementation of the Act’s provisions and their impact on healthcare outcomes. While the Act presents a well-intentioned framework, its effectiveness in transforming healthcare access for transgender individuals remains underexplored, which forms the core focus of this review. The analysis aims to assess the efficacy of healthcare policy implementation, explore the barriers transgender individuals face in accessing healthcare, and identify areas where further research and policy reform are needed.

Objectives of the Review

The primary objectives of this review are as follows:

To evaluate the implementation of healthcare policies for transgender individuals under the Transgender Persons Act, 2019, with particular emphasis on gender-affirming care, mental health services and general healthcare access.

To identify the principal barriers to healthcare access for transgender individuals in India, including discrimination, gaps in provider awareness, financial challenges and regional disparities.

To compare healthcare access and policy implementation across different regions of India, highlighting the successes and shortcomings of state-level initiatives aimed at improving transgender healthcare.

To critically analyse the role of healthcare professionals and institutions in providing care to transgender individuals, focusing on cultural competency, training and institutional support.

To identify gaps in current research on transgender healthcare in India and propose recommendations for future studies and policy reforms, as well as to provide a comparative analysis by examining international best practices in transgender healthcare and assessing how these can inform healthcare policy and practice in India.

Through these objectives, this review aims to contribute to the growing body of literature on transgender healthcare in India. It provides actionable insights for policymakers, healthcare providers and researchers, supporting the development of more inclusive and effective healthcare policies for transgender individuals in India.

Legal and Policy Framework in India

Transgender individuals face healthcare challenges that transcend public health issues, highlighting a significant human rights concern (Nayar, 2023). International frameworks, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which India has ratified, recognise access to healthcare as a fundamental right (Zaman, 2025). The World Health Organization and UNAIDS have consistently underscored the need for healthcare policies that are inclusive and free from discrimination, particularly for vulnerable groups like transgender individuals, who suffer from disproportionately negative health outcomes due to stigma and exclusion.

In India, there is an urgent demand for healthcare services tailored to the transgender community, which is both extensive and varied. The 2011 Census of India reported around 490,000 transgender individuals, but advocacy groups believe the true figure is significantly higher (Nagarajan, 2014). Historically, this group has been overlooked in public health initiatives, and they continue to experience elevated rates of HIV, mental health disorders, substance abuse and suicide compared to the general populace (Subapriya, 2016). These issues are intensified by societal stigma, economic marginalisation, and the absence of consistent legal recognition until recent years.

The legal socio-legal space underwent a notable shift after the NALSA v Union of India judgement (2014), where transgenders were legally accepted as the third gender in the country. The Transgender Persons Act of 2019 worked to elaborate on this positive shift and aimed to rectify the injustices endured by the community members by ensuring that healthcare services are accessible to all without discrimination. It also advocated for the creation of healthcare initiatives specifically designed to meet the unique needs of transgender people, including gender-affirming treatments (Jain, 2022). Nevertheless, even with these legal measures in place, the state of transgender healthcare remains significantly inadequate. Discrimination, a lack of provider awareness, financial obstacles and regional disparities continue to impede access to necessary healthcare for transgender individuals.

This review area is of both contemporary relevance and historical significance, as it integrates the domains of healthcare, human rights and social justice. Addressing the healthcare needs of transgender individuals is essential for India’s commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). As India continues to emerge as a global health leader, it must reaffirm its dedication to ensuring equitable healthcare access for all, including the marginalised transgender community. Despite the existence of these illustrative legal frameworks and international commitments, the practical implementation and positive impact on community well-being remain questionable. This situation necessitates a review of the post-implementation progress of the 2014 and 2019 transgender laws.

Methodology

This research employs a qualitative review methodology to explore transgender healthcare in India after the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, was passed. The review integrates peer-reviewed articles, policy documents, government reports and institutional publications to evaluate healthcare accessibility, policy execution and systemic obstacles faced by transgender individuals. Literature from 2012 to 2023 was sourced from databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and JSTOR, with a focus on studies conducted after 2019. The primary search terms included transgender healthcare in India, gender-affirming care, Transgender Persons Act 2019, mental health and healthcare access. A total of forty-five sources that met the inclusion criteria were chosen for analysis. The selected studies underwent thematic synthesis, identifying and critically analysing recurring themes such as gender-affirming care, mental health services, cultural competence of healthcare providers, regional disparities, financial obstacles and policy implementation. The review is directed by research questions concerning healthcare access, policy effectiveness and international comparative practices.

Results

This review examined forty-five peer-reviewed articles, government reports and policy briefs published from 2012 to 2023. Among these, thirty articles concentrated on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, with a particular focus on healthcare outcomes following the legislation. The other fifteen studies offered insights into the broader healthcare challenges faced by transgender individuals in India before the Act’s implementation. The following sections critically examine key findings from the included studies, organised into five major themes: implementation of gender-affirming care, regional disparities in healthcare access, training and cultural competency of healthcare providers, mental health services and financial barriers and economic inequality.

Implementation of Gender-affirming Care

Despite the enactment of the 2019 Transgender Rights Law, which established official policy, research consistently indicates inadequate implementation of trans-friendly health services across India. Government-run hospitals frequently fail to provide essential treatments, such as hormone therapy or gender transition surgery (Ahuja et al., 2024; Raghuram et al., 2024; Shah et al., 2024). Data reveal that fewer than 20% of state medical centres offer any specialised care for transgender individuals, and only slightly more than 10% provide comprehensive options that include both hormone therapy and surgical procedures (Ahuja et al., 2024; Shah et al., 2024). These services are predominantly available in major urban hospitals, necessitating that transgender individuals from rural areas or smaller towns travel considerable distances, often resorting to expensive private clinics (Fernandez & Gaitonde, 2025; Raghuram et al., 2024).

Where public centres do offer such care, it is often inadequate due to a lack of skilled providers, clear medical protocols and robust support from hospital systems (Ahuja et al., 2024; Shah et al., 2024). Additionally, bureaucratic obstacles, such as the requirement for official documentation to verify gender identity to access affordable care, are frequently cited as significant barriers (Raghuram et al., 2024; Tapadia, 2021). The slow processing of paperwork and convoluted procedures tend to delay or obstruct necessary health services, disproportionately affecting low-income transgender individuals (Raghuram et al., 2024).

Regional Disparities in Healthcare Access

Numerous studies have identified significant disparities in the accessibility of medical care for transgender individuals, contingent upon their geographical location. In southern regions, such as Kerala and Tamil Nadu, progressive local policies and insurance schemes that encompass treatments like hormone therapy and surgery are frequently highlighted (Ahuja et al., 2024; Choi et al., 2021; Fernandez & Gaitonde, 2025). These measures facilitate easier access to essential healthcare services for transgender individuals in these areas. Conversely, research indicates that transgender individuals in regions such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and certain parts of West Bengal often encounter substantial challenges in accessing medical care (Ahuja et al., 2024; Raj & Dubey, 2024). In these areas, fewer than one in twenty government hospitals provide treatments related to gender identity.

Additionally, visiting a healthcare provider can be challenging due to inadequately equipped clinics, insufficiently trained staff and prevailing societal biases (Ahuja et al., 2024; Raj & Dubey, 2024). The decentralised nature of India’s healthcare system, which grants significant authority to local governments, results in inconsistent implementation of national policies concerning medical assistance (Choi et al., 2021; Tapadia, 2021). Disparities in financial resources among regions exacerbate these gaps, as transgender individuals in economically disadvantaged areas often lack the means to travel to urban centres for treatment (Raghuram et al., 2024; Raj & Dubey, 2024).

Training and Cultural Competency of Healthcare Providers

One significant issue identified in studies is the insufficient training of medical professionals in transgender health. Many healthcare providers have not received adequate education regarding cultural competence in this domain. Research indicates that approximately 70% of medical personnel report receiving minimal formal instruction on transgender-specific care, such as the administration of gender-affirming treatments (Shah et al., 2024; Wynn et al., 2024). Consequently, transgender individuals frequently encounter suboptimal treatment in clinical settings, including being addressed by incorrect names, being subjected to intrusive questioning, or experiencing dismissive attitudes from healthcare providers (Degtiar et al., 2025).

Interviews reveal that some medical professionals lack understanding of hormone therapies or allow personal biases to interfere with patient care (Raghuram et al., 2024; Wynn et al., 2024). In the absence of comprehensive national medical guidelines and limited training on transgender health, healthcare providers may deliver inconsistent or even harmful care (Shah et al., 2024; Shrivastava & Shrivastava, 2023). Due to negative past experiences, many transgender individuals avoid seeking medical care, leading to delayed diagnoses, disrupted treatment plans or complete disengagement from healthcare services (Degtiar et al., 2025; Raghuram et al., 2024).

Mental Health Services

Mental well-being is frequently overlooked in the context of medical care for transgender individuals in India. Empirical studies consistently indicate elevated levels of depression, anxiety, emotional distress and suicidal ideation among this population, primarily due to gender dysphoria, social rejection and systemic discrimination (Ahuja et al., 2024; Puckett, 2023). Despite their heightened vulnerability, transgender individuals often encounter significant barriers to accessing appropriate mental health services. Research indicates that fewer than one in ten counsellors in India possess adequate training to address the specific mental health needs of transgender individuals (Ahuja et al., 2024; Puckett, 2023).

Consequently, many transgender individuals experience misdiagnoses, pathologisation of their gender identity, or are subjected to harmful practices akin to ‘conversion therapy’ (Ahuja et al., 2024; Puckett, 2023). Due to apprehensions about discrimination in conventional healthcare settings, many transgender individuals seek support from community groups or friends (Socías, 2014). While these networks provide substantial emotional support, they are often ill-equipped to address severe or chronic mental health issues, resulting in critical gaps in care (Ahuja et al., 2024; Socías, 2014).

Financial Barriers and Economic Inequality

Financial constraints significantly impede transgender individuals in India from accessing medical care. Gender-affirming surgeries are costly, and the cumulative expenses of hormone therapy and necessary counselling are prohibitively high for many. A substantial portion of the transgender population, particularly those already experiencing financial hardship, cannot afford these services (Raghuram et al., 2024; Shah et al., 2024).

Research indicates that less than 15% of transgender individuals can finance comprehensive transition-related treatments through private healthcare services (Raghuram et al., 2024; Shah et al., 2024). Although states such as Kerala and Tamil Nadu offer government-supported programmes that partially subsidise surgical costs, these initiatives are limited to specific regions, leaving many without access nationwide (Ahuja et al., 2024; Choi et al., 2021).

In areas lacking public healthcare options, transgender individuals may incur debt, engage in precarious employment or resort to unsafe medical practices, thereby increasing their risk of severe health complications (Raghuram et al., 2024). Economic challenges exacerbate difficulties in obtaining adequate care, as over 80% of transgender individuals either face unemployment or are relegated to low-paying jobs due to exclusion from mainstream employment opportunities (Ahuja et al., 2024; Wynn et al., 2024). Without a stable income, maintaining access to quality healthcare becomes exceedingly challenging.

Discussion

This review investigates the current state of transgender healthcare services in India subsequent to the implementation of the 2019 Transgender Rights Law. The analysis reveals that, although the legislation formally acknowledges the rights of transgender individuals, the practical delivery of healthcare services remains insufficient. Despite the legal assurances of equitable treatment and access, transgender individuals frequently face entrenched barriers—structural, social and economic—that hinder their access to necessary medical care. These obstacles appear to be deeply embedded within the operational framework of India’s healthcare system, the education and training of medical professionals and societal attitudes towards gender diversity. The following discussion elaborates on these findings through five interrelated perspectives.

The Policy–Practice Gap in Post-2019 Transgender Healthcare

The report highlights a notable discrepancy between legislative provisions and practical implementation. Although the Act mandates the government to provide equitable medical services, it lacks a comprehensive plan, specific deadlines or established guidelines for transgender health support. Consequently, the availability of treatment varies significantly across regions, with some areas receiving assistance while others do not. This disparity between legal frameworks and actual practice reflects a broader pattern within India’s welfare system, where rights are enshrined in law, yet insufficient efforts are made to develop robust systems or evaluate their effectiveness. In the absence of clear medical standards or mechanisms for monitoring care, government health centres often independently determine their course of action, resulting in inconsistent treatment. Thus, the mere existence of legal recognition has not led to consistent improvements in healthcare access for transgender individuals.

Federalism and Regional Inequality in Healthcare Access

The findings indicate that the fragmented healthcare system in India exacerbates challenges in accessing transgender care in certain regions. In states such as Kerala and Tamil Nadu, where governmental actions are more prompt and healthcare facilities are more developed, legislative measures translate into tangible medical assistance. Conversely, in areas with weaker healthcare infrastructures and more conservative gender norms, progress is minimal.

These regional disparities highlight that the provision of transgender care is not solely contingent upon federal legislation; it is also shaped by each state’s priorities, programme management capabilities and public engagement. In the absence of nationwide coordination or standardised service regulations, the decentralisation of authority to states may exacerbate disparities rather than ameliorate them (Williams et al., 2024). This situation raises significant concerns regarding how national health leadership can support equitable access without undermining local governance.

Healthcare Providers, Cultural Competency and Institutional Bias

The lack of education and social awareness among medical professionals emerges as a significant barrier to providing robust healthcare support for transgender individuals. The findings indicate that many clinicians are not adequately prepared to deliver inclusive treatment, not only due to insufficient technical expertise but also because of entrenched beliefs regarding gender roles. This deficiency extends beyond personal biases, highlighting systemic inadequacies. Healthcare training programmes across India seldom incorporate care for transgender individuals, resulting in most providers being ill-equipped to offer appropriate support.

In the absence of clear standards, personal attitudes often replace established guidelines, leading to misnaming, intrusive questioning, or discriminatory behaviour. Such experiences significantly impact individuals’ willingness to seek medical assistance. The persistent experience of disrespect or indifference discourages transgender individuals from seeking care, resulting in delayed diagnoses, accumulation of health issues, and, at times, resorting to unreliable alternatives for coping. Enhancing providers’ understanding is not merely supplementary; it is essential for achieving improved healthcare outcomes.

Mental Health as the Most Neglected Dimension of Care

Despite the provisions of the Transgender Persons Act, which mandates access to medical care, mental health services remain marginalised in both practical implementation and official policy frameworks. Research indicates that the emotional well-being of transgender individuals is insufficiently prioritised, even amidst prevalent stressors such as discrimination, isolation and abuse. The persistence of stigmatising practices highlights the reliance on outdated therapeutic models and deficiencies in practitioner education. When mental health care pathologises transgender identities rather than addressing the distress caused by systemic bias, healthcare institutions may exacerbate rather than alleviate harm.

The reliance on informal community support networks underscores the resilience of transgender communities but also reflects the inadequacies of clinical and hospital services. While peer support provides genuine solace, its prevalence indicates a lack of trust in formal agencies. Integrating transgender-affirmative counselling into government-operated healthcare systems could potentially address some of these deficiencies.

Financial Exclusion and the Political Economy of Transgender Health

Financial barriers frequently impede access to healthcare more significantly than any other factor. These challenges are not isolated but are interconnected with broader social and economic disparities. Employment discrimination, informal labour or unstable income exacerbate the difficulty for transgender individuals to afford healthcare costs, regardless of the availability of clinics. The inconsistent implementation of government-supported insurance for gender-affirming treatments illustrates how financial difficulties intersect with geographic location.

In regions lacking public funding, transgender individuals often resort to expensive or unreliable private healthcare, thereby incurring additional expenses and facing increased medical risks. This situation underscores that addressing healthcare inadequacies is insufficient if economic structures remain flawed. To effectively address the inequitable treatment of transgender individuals’ health, policies must target fundamental issues such as employment, housing and income support, rather than treating healthcare as an isolated concern.

Situating the Indian Experience in a Global Context

Examining other countries reveals that legal rights can be beneficial; however, they do not invariably result in equitable healthcare. For instance, in Argentina and Thailand, despite the presence of robust legal frameworks, disparities persist due to factors such as uneven access, financial constraints or inadequate staff training. In India, similar patterns emerge, exacerbated by the decentralised distribution of power and profound social inequalities. These parallels indicate that India is not isolated in its struggle to translate transgender rights into tangible medical access. The experiences of other nations underscore the importance of consistent funding, the establishment of clear treatment guidelines and the implementation of systems that hold institutions accountable.

Implications for Policy and Practice

The findings indicate a pressing need to address substantive deficiencies in healthcare, rather than merely feigning concern. Legislation alone is insufficient; there must be comprehensive implementation, explicit medical guidelines and mandatory staff training. Immediate expansion of mental health support is imperative, alongside insurance policies that unequivocally cover gender-related care and ongoing therapy.

Crucially, integrating transgender healthcare into broader initiatives aimed at dismantling financial barriers and inequitable systems is essential. Without such integration, improvements in care may remain fragmented and inaccessible to those most in need. The following implications emerge from the analysis.

Strengthening Policy Implementation and Accountability

A primary insight from this retrospective examination is the urgent need to move beyond merely declaring rights and towards the active implementation of policies. The lack of uniform national regulations for transgender health services results in significant disparities in care quality, influenced by geographic location and the specific healthcare facility. Developing comprehensive, evidence-based standards for interventions such as hormone therapy, surgical procedures and post-operative care could mitigate inconsistencies and enhance access to healthcare services.

Additionally, it is crucial to establish rigorous oversight mechanisms to ensure healthcare facilities adhere to these standards. Regular inspections, clear communication regarding available transgender care options, and straightforward processes for reporting issues could effectively bridge the gap between legislative frameworks and their practical application in clinical settings.

Integrating Cultural Competency into Healthcare Education and Training

The findings underscore the necessity of re-evaluating medical education to integrate cultural competencies in transgender healthcare as a fundamental component, rather than an ancillary one. It is imperative that medical school curricula incorporate mandatory courses that address respectful communication, appropriate clinical procedures for gender-affirming care, and equitable interactions with transgender individuals. Such integration could enhance both the quality of healthcare services and the confidence of healthcare providers.

Continuous professional development through ongoing training is essential for healthcare practitioners to address any gaps in their initial education. Furthermore, the establishment of explicit institutional policies against discriminatory practices, such as the misuse of names or unwarranted inquiries into personal matters, contributes to a safer and more respectful environment for patients.

Expanding and Integrating Mental Health Services

The mental health requirements of transgender individuals are frequently overlooked in the realm of healthcare. It is imperative for governmental bodies to proactively increase funding for mental health programmes that are specifically designed to address the needs of the transgender population. By incorporating counselling services into routine medical appointments and transition-related healthcare, the pursuit of mental health support can be normalised, thereby diminishing associated stigma. Public healthcare institutions could collaborate with local organisations or charitable groups to establish integrated care models, which would combine medical expertise with community engagement. Such partnerships would broaden the reach of mental health services while ensuring that they are delivered by qualified professionals.

Addressing Regional Disparities Through State-specific Strategies

In India’s diverse healthcare system, local leadership plays a crucial role in facilitating access to transgender care. In regions where states support inclusive programmes, significant progress is evident, demonstrating that grassroots initiatives and effective management can make a substantial impact. A national strategy that establishes fundamental care guidelines while allowing states the flexibility to tailor their implementation could potentially reduce disparities between regions. Incentives such as targeted funding, training programmes or platforms for exchanging ideas may encourage states to provide equitable healthcare services regardless of location.

Reducing Financial Barriers and Promoting Economic Inclusion

Economic constraints continue to obstruct many individuals from obtaining necessary medical care. Public insurance policies must incorporate coverage for medical procedures such as surgeries and hormone therapies for transgender individuals, as these are essential healthcare needs. By ensuring coverage for these treatments, individuals will be less likely to seek services from unregulated clinics or bear the financial burden of out-of-pocket expenses. Additionally, healthcare policies must be supported by comprehensive societal and economic reforms to be truly effective. Discrimination in employment and housing insecurity significantly impacts individuals’ health and well-being. Strengthening economic stability through vocational education, equitable recruitment practices and rigorous enforcement of anti-discrimination laws could indirectly enhance access to healthcare services.

Towards an Integrated Model of Transgender Healthcare

The findings indicate the necessity for an integrated system in which healthcare respects individuals’ rights and recognises transgender health as encompassing more than merely medical needs. Comprehensive healthcare for transgender individuals should simultaneously address physical, emotional, community and financial factors. Fragmented or insufficient efforts may exacerbate inequities rather than ameliorate them. An integrated approach—combining standard healthcare, emotional support, vocational training, equitable financial opportunities and community engagement—offers the most effective means to realise the medical freedoms promised by the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.

Conclusion

This review examined transgender healthcare in India post-2019, evaluating the impact of the new legislation on access to care, equity and hospital practices. Although the Transgender Persons Act represents a significant legal advancement, findings indicate that the protections it offers have not resulted in consistent or equitable medical access across the nation. Instead, substantial gaps persist in practical support.

There is a notable deficiency in the provision of adequate support for transgender individuals, particularly in the realm of mental health services, where assistance is limited, and medical professionals frequently exhibit a lack of understanding. This issue is symptomatic of broader systemic challenges within India’s healthcare infrastructure, where regulatory measures are often inadequately implemented, with some states exhibiting sluggish responses while others hastily implement incomplete solutions. The training available for healthcare providers is minimal, and the compounded effects of poverty and societal stigma further marginalise many individuals. Legislative measures, while present, fail to address the practical disparities, as meaningful change is contingent upon consistent and effective implementation of policies.

Disparities persist in the provision of transgender health care across various regions. While certain states have demonstrated that improved policies can significantly enhance outcomes, numerous areas continue to fall short. This is often due to the limited availability of clinics or resistance to change. In the absence of robust nationwide regulations, local systems frequently fail to provide equitable services.

The review highlights the insufficient attention given to mental well-being within transgender healthcare. The lack of adequately trained counsellors and inclusive programmes exacerbates emotional challenges, leading to increased scepticism towards medical institutions. Addressing this issue necessitates moving beyond outdated perspectives; instead, support should prioritise respect, dignity and genuine access within government-supported clinics.

This review highlights that transgender healthcare in India is influenced by legal, medical, economic and societal factors, each contributing significantly. Equitable access necessitates adequate medical and mental health services; however, comprehensive solutions must also address employment discrimination, income disparities and social isolation.

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, establishes a fundamental legal framework; however, its effectiveness is contingent upon robust enforcement mechanisms. In conjunction with this, comprehensive training for relevant personnel is imperative. Additionally, there is a need for increased public funding for healthcare services. Consistent governmental support is also essential. Addressing these entrenched issues will facilitate India’s progress towards more equitable healthcare. Consequently, transgender individuals may ultimately receive treatment that acknowledges their inherent dignity, thereby actualising their access to equitable healthcare.

Footnotes

Author Contribution

All the authors have contributed equally to this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Yadamala Sreenivasulu

References

Ahuja

T. K.

, Goel

A. D.

, Gupta

M. K.

, Joshi

, Choudhary

, Suman

, Taluja

, Mittal

, Ghuman

N. K.

, Suthar

, & Bhardwaj

(2024). Health care needs and barriers to care among the transgender population: A study from western Rajasthan. BMC Health Services Research , 24(1), 989. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11010-2

Choi

, Lim

, Jung

, Kim

, & Park

(2021). Use of menstrual sanitary products in women of reproductive Age: Korea nurses’ health study. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives , 12(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2021.12.1.04

Costa

A. B.

, Da Rosa Filho

H. T.

, Pase

P. F.

, Fontanari

A. M. V.

, Catelan

R. F.

, Mueller

, Cardoso

, Soll

, Schwarz

, Schneider

M. A.

, Gagliotti

D. a. M.

, Saadeh

, Lobato

M. I. R.

, Nardi

H. C.

, & Koller

S. H.

(2016). Healthcare needs of and access barriers for Brazilian transgender and gender diverse people. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health , 20(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0527-7

Degtiar

, Kim

, Michaels

, Huff

, Rudacille

, Clusen

, Ferguson

, Smith-Howell

, & Gonzales

(2025). Disparities in preventive health services between transgender and cisgender adults by state-level policy environments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 69(4), 107954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954

Fernandez

, & Gaitonde

(2025). Barriers to health care access among transgender people in Kerala. International Journal of Equity in Health . https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6826079/v1

Jain

(2022). Right to health and gender-affirmative procedure in the Transgender Persons Act 2019 in India. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery , 55(2), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749137

Johnson

A. H.

, Hill

, Beach-Ferrara

, Rogers

B. A.

, & Bradford

(2019). Common barriers to healthcare for transgender people in the U.S. Southeast. International Journal of Transgender Health , 21(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2019.1700203

Nagarajan

(2014). First count of third gender in census: 4.9 lakh. The Times of India . https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/first-count-of-third-gender-in-census-4-9-lakh/articleshow/35741613.cms

Nayar

K. R.

(2023). Public health: Reflections on orientation, pedagogy and methodologies. Preventive Medicine Research & Reviews . https://doi.org/10.4103/pmrr.pmrr_55_23

10.

Puckett

J. A.

, Dyar

, Maroney

M. R.

, Mustanski

, & Newcomb

M. E.

(2023). Daily experiences of minority stress and mental health in transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science , 132(3), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000814

11.

Raghuram

, Parakh

, Tugnawat

, Singh

, Shaikh

, & Bhan

(2024). Experiences of transgender persons in accessing routine healthcare services in India: Findings from a participatory qualitative study. PLoS Global Public Health , 4(2), e0002933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002933

12.

Raj

, & Dubey

(2024). Comprehending health of the transgender population in India through bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Public Health , 69, 1606598. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1606598

13.

Shah

, Hassan

, Alexis

, Bhoopalam

, Agandi

, & Liang

(2024). Gender-affirming surgery in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine , 13(12), 3580. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123580

14.

Shrivastava

, & Shrivastava

(2023). Medical education and humanitarian emergencies: Necessity to strengthen. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU) , 16(3), 432. https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_295_23

15.

Socías

M. E.

, Marshall

B. D. L.

, Arístegui

, Zalazar

, Romero

, Sued

, & Kerr

(2014). Towards full citizenship: Correlates of engagement with the gender identity law among transwomen in Argentina. PLoS One , 9(8), e105402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105402

16.

Subapriya

(2016). Unveiling the crisis of transgender in India: A study of living smile Vidya’s autobiography. Journal of English Language and Literature , 3(1), 59–64.

17.

Tapadia

(2021). Unveiling the struggles and triumphs: A comprehensive examination of transgender identity recognition in India. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law , 3(3), 1–18.

18.

Williams

K. K. A.

, Baidoobonso

, Lofters

, Haggerty

, Leblanc

, & Adams

A. M.

(2024). Anti-black racism in Canadian health care: A qualitative study of diverse perceptions of racism and racial discrimination among Black adults in Montreal, Quebec. BMC Public Health , 24(1), 3152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20636-0

19.

Wynn

S. N.

, Solanki

, Millington

, Copeland

, Lu

, McNair

, & Sanchez

A. A.

(2024). LGBTQIA health in medical education: A national survey of Australian medical students. BMC Medical Education , 24(1), 733. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05099-6

20.

Zaman

(2025). Right to health as a human right: India’s obligations under ICESCR and COVID-19 response. SSRN . https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5567498