Effects of Test Parameters on Fracture and Fatigue Characteristics of a SE(T) Steel Specimen

Abstract

The understanding of crack behavior under fatigue remains a critical issue in addressing the performance of bridge structures. In this study, effects of test parameters on the stress intensity factor (K) of a modified single edge notched tension [SE(T)] steel specimen with a through width notch was experimentally, analytically and numerically investigated. Equations were developed to include the effects of fix boundary condition on K and crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) of the crack. Effects of axial and angular misalignments on K along the crack length were examined and a progressively decreasing influence on K was observed when the crack size increased. Two dimensional (2D) and three dimensional (3D) Finite Element Method (FEM) was used to evaluate the effect of the two end bounding conditions on K value of non-uniform crack fronts. Influence of ungripped length of the specimen on K was evaluated and showed to be more substantial for short specimens. Finally, a framework was proposed to map the crack front evolution through high cycle fatigue tests for a modified SE(T) specimen with initial crack inclination.

Keywords

alignment cracking fatigue finite element method fracture mechanics steel bridges stress intensity factor

References

J.M.

Y.Q.

and Tian

Q.L.

(1992). “Hysteretic behavior and empirical modelling of a wire-cable vibration isolator”, International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 111–127.

ASTM E561–10e1 (2010). Standard Test Method for K–R Curve Determination, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

ASTM E647–11e1 (2011). Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

Barsoum

R.S.

(1975). “Further application of quadratic isoparametric finite elements to linear fracture mechanics of plate bending and general shells”, International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 167–169.

Forman

Kearney

and Engle

R.M.

(1967). “Numerical analysis of crack propagation in cyclic-loaded structures”, Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 89, pp. 459–464.

Gong

Nyborg

and Oommen

(1992). “Acoustic emission monitoring of steel railroad bridges”, Material Evaluation, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 883–887.

Hamstad

M.A.

and McColskey

J.D.

(1997). “Wideband and narrowband acoustic emission waveforms from extraneous sources during fatigue of steel samples”, Journal of Acoustic Emission, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1–18.

Henshell

R.D.

(1975). “Shaw KG. crack tip finite elements are unnecessary”, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 495–507.

John

Kaldon

and Johnson

(1985). “Weight function for a single edge cracked geometry with clamped ends”, International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 72, pp. 145–158.

10.

John

and Rigling

(1998). “Effect of height to width ratio on K and CMOD solutions for a single edge cracked geometry with clamped ends”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 147–156.

11.

Martin

Way

C.V.

Lockyer

Kudva

and Ziola

S.M.

(1995). “Acoustic emission testing on an F/A-18 E/F titanium bulkhead”, Proceeding SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials, Smart Sensing, Processing, and Instrumentation, San Diego, USA, Vol. 2444, pp. 204–211.

12.

Metrovich

and Fisher

J.W.

(2005). “Fatigue strength of stainless steel weldments”, International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 189–197.

13.

Paris

P.C.

Gomez

M.P.

and Anderson

W.E.

(1961). “A rational analytic theory of fatigue”, The Trend in Engineering, Vol. 13, pp. 9–14.

14.

Roberts

and Talebzadeh

(2003). “Fatigue life prediction based on crack propagation and acoustic emission count rates”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 679–694.

15.

Tada

Paris

P.C.

and Irwin

G.R.

(2000). The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Third Edition, Three Park Avenue New York, New York, USA.

16.

Ziehl

Zárate

and Caicedo

(2011). “Prediction of fatigue crack growth in steel bridge components using acoustic emission”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 67, No. 8, pp. 1254–1260.

17.

Ziehl

P.H.

(2008). “Applications of acoustic emission evaluation for civil infrastructure”, Proceedings of the SPIE, Nondestructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security, San Diego, California, USA, Vol. 6934.