Abstract
The frequency of constraint-induced movement therapy ranged from 1 to 7 days per week, with an average of 4.98 days. Duration ranged from 2 to 10 weeks, with an average of 3.14 weeks. The components of dosage were reported in outcome studies conducted in inpatient settings and rehabilitation clinics.
Primary Author and Speaker: Bryan Gee
Additional Authors and Speakers: Rebecca Butikofer, Nicole Covington, and Kimberly Lloyd
A commonly used intervention for people with acute and chronic neurological conditions, constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), is widely accepted as an effective intervention within the profession of occupational therapy to increase upper limb function (Gillen, 2016). The purpose of this study was to explore findings related to the documented dosage—number of sessions, length of plan of care and session, type of delivery, setting, and intervention type—in published outcome studies using CIMT with adults with chronic neurological dysfunction.
The frequency of constraint-induced movement therapy ranged from 1 to 7 days per week, with an average of 4.98 days. Duration ranged from 2 to 10 wk, with an average of 3.14 wk. Descriptive statistics related to dosage were as follows: M = 65.6 total intervention hours, M = 4.9 days/wk of CIMT, and M = 3.05 wk in duration of the overall CIMT intervention procedure. 75% of the studies documented using repetitive task-oriented training, 40% reported incorporating daily home program activities, and 97% reported constraining the nonaffected limb as part of the intervention or experimental portion of the study. Conditions for which CIMT was applied included acute, subacute, and chronic stroke; ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke; traumatic brain injury; Parkinson’s disease; and ulnar or median nerve injury. Levels of evidence ranged from randomized controlled trials to multiple-baseline single-case studies. The studies were conducted in university laboratories and inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings.
Gannotti, M. E., Christy, J. B., Heathcock, J. C., & Kolobe, T. H. (2014). A path model for evaluating dosing parameters for children with cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy, 94, 411–421. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130022
Gillen, G. (2016). Stroke rehabilitation: A function-based approach (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
Gee, B., Lloyd, K., Devine, N., Tyrrell, E., Evans, T., Hill, R., . . . Magalogo, K. (2016). Dosage parameters in pediatric outcome studies reported in 9 peer-reviewed occupational therapy journals from 2008 to 2014: A content analysis. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2016, 3580789. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3580789
Gutman, S. A. (2010). State of the journal, 2010. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 832–840. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.064601
