Date Presented 04/03/2025
Participants completed the Revised Self-Report Assessment of Functional Visual Performance and the Low Vision Quality of Life assessment. Technology was beneficial, and no correlations were observed between functional performance and quality of life.
Primary Author and Speaker: Callie Victor
Contributing Authors: Jamika Acevedo, Coley Carpenter, Capri Cunniff, Margaret Fretwell, Kimberlee Geminiano, Moira Malloy, Jasheem McRae, Rachel Penner
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine how functional performance and the use of technology influence the quality of life for adults with vision loss. The research was guided by the following question: How do functional performance and the use of technology influence the quality of life for adults with vision loss?
DESIGN: Participants for this descriptive study were recruited through convenience sampling from low vision support groups.
METHOD: Ten participants completed recorded interviews and two assessments: the Revised Self-Report Assessment of Functional Visual Performance (R-SRAFVP), which evaluates functional performance, and the Low Vision Quality of Life (LVQOL) assessment, designed to measure the quality of life of individuals with visual impairments. Participants also shared personal experiences regarding vision loss, the use of technology and how technology influences their quality of life.
RESULTS: Scores on the R-SRAFVP assessment ranged from 61 to 94, with an average score of 77 out of 100. On the LVQOL assessment, scores ranged from 27 to 105, with an average of 67.20 out of a maximum score of 125. Analysis revealed no correlation between functional visual performance and quality of life. Participants provided insights into their unique experiences, including their perceptions of circumstances, daily activities, and use of resources and technology, highlighting its influence on both functional performance and quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Quality of life perceptions are dynamic and not solely dependent on independence in daily activities. Technology was generally perceived as beneficial, enhancing participants' quality of life.
IMPACT STATEMENT: Further research is needed to better understand how technology influences functional performance and quality of life for individuals with vision loss, ultimately informing interventions and support strategies for this population.
References
Kaldenberg, J., & Smallfield, S. (2020). Occupational therapy practice guidelines for older adults with low vision. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(2) 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.742003
Kim, H. N. (2021). Characteristics of technology adoption by older adults with visual disabilities. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(13) 1256–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1876359
Taipale, J., Mikhailova, A., Ojamo, M., Nättinen, J., Väätäinen, S., Gissler, M., Koskinen, S., Rissanen, H., Sainio, P., & Uusitalo, H. (2019). Low vision status and declining vision decrease health-related quality of life: Results from a nationwide 11-year follow-up study. Quality of Life Research, 28, 3225–3236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02260-3
Taylor, D. J., Hobby, A. E., Binns, A. M., & Crabb, D. P. (2016). How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review. BMJ Open, 6, e011504. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011504
