The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to review risk behaviors and their health consequences in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The existing literature on common risk behaviors in adolescents is examined, with a focus on illicit drug use, alcohol use, smoking, unprotected sexual activity, and disordered eating behaviors.

Conclusions

A review of the literature highlights the lack of studies of risk behaviors in this population. Much of what is known comes from studies with adolescents in the general population or from studies of adults with type 1 diabetes. Known risk and protective factors for risk behaviors and health outcomes are noted. Based on these findings, suggestions are provided for diabetes educators and health care providers to assess for and prevent risk behaviors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Directions for future research in this population are indicated, including the need to develop and test standardized prevention programs.

Purpose

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of a culturally sensitive, empowerment-based diabetes self-management education program for Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinos.

Methods

A prospective quasi-experimental repeated measures design tested the effectiveness of the ¡Si, Yo Puedo Controlar Mi Diabetes! diabetes self-management education program. In sum, 144 persons residing in 2 Texas counties at the Texas-Mexico border (Starr and Hidalgo) served as participants. Two groups were formed, an intervention and a control (wait list). Clinical (A1C), cognitive, attitudinal, behavioral, and cultural assessments were collected at baseline and 3 months.

Results

Demographic characteristics for the intervention and control groups were similar. Both groups were predominately female, low income, older than 40 years, and minimally acculturated. Baseline and posttest findings showed that the intervention group had a significant reduction in A1C values; median difference was 0.3 (n = 45), especially for those with higher baseline values. Participants in the intervention group also improved in their self-efficacy and self-care scores.

Conclusions

Findings from the study suggest that additional dissemination of a diabetes self-management education program for Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinos is warranted to improve clinical outcomes and associated diabetes self-efficacy and self-care behaviors.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a care delivery model integrating the registered nurse–certified diabetes educator into the patient-centered medical home to assist in achieving positive clinical and cost outcomes in diabetes care.

Methods

A 1-group pretest-posttest research design was used. Patients were recruited from 2 patient-centered medical home designated/nominated primary care offices. Inclusion criteria were as follows: diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes, aged 18 to 80 years, A1C ≥ 8%, English speaking, and no diabetes education within 6 months. There were 34 participants (men, n = 22; women, n = 12) with a mean age of 53.24. The intervention incorporated an assessment, 4 patient-centered monthly group sessions, and 4 individual follow-up sessions. Study measures included program surveys, participation and satisfaction rates, Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set attainment rates, and the following physiologic measures obtained from the medical record: A1C, fasting blood glucose, LDL, urine microalbumin, blood pressure, retinal eye exam, and body mass index. Cost-effectiveness measures included program costs, performance incentives, revenue, provider time saved, and patient health care utilization.

Results

Paired-samples t tests identified significant improvements in A1C, fasting blood glucose, and LDL. Patients and providers were highly satisfied with the program. Cost-benefit analysis revealed a net pretax program benefit.

Conclusions

Results of the study indicated that integrating the registered nurse–certified diabetes educator in the patient-centered medical home improves clinical outcomes and is cost-effective. Diabetes education and support are integral components of diabetes management.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore physicians’ perceptions of the multidisciplinary type 2 diabetes treatment team.

Methods

Nineteen physicians (74% endocrinologists; 26% primary care) participated in semistructured interviews. Audiorecorded data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo 8 software.

Results

Physicians considered the multidisciplinary team, including a physician and diabetes educator, as very important to diabetes treatment. Participants described how diabetes, with its many comorbidities and challenging lifestyle recommendations, is difficult for any single physician to treat. They further described how the team’s diverse staff offers complementary skills and more contact time for assessment and treatment of patients, developing treatment relationships, and supporting patients in learning diabetes self-care. Physicians stressed the necessity of regular and ongoing communication among team members to ensure patients receive consistent information, and some reported that institutional factors interfere with intra-team communication. They also expressed concerns about the team approach in relation to individualized treatment and patients’ reluctance to see multiple providers.

Conclusions

This study highlights physicians’ positive perceptions of and concerns about the type 2 diabetes multidisciplinary team. Further study of diabetes educators’ and patients’ perceptions of the team approach is needed.

Purpose

To assess whether VA MEDIC-E (Veterans Affairs Multi-disciplinary Education and Diabetes Intervention for Cardiac risk reduction[EM DASH] Extended for 6 months), a pharmacist-led shared medical appointments program, could improve attainment of target goals for hypertension, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to standard primary care after 6 months of intervention.

Methods

A randomized, controlled trial of VA MEDIC-E (n = 50) versus standard primary care (n = 49) in veterans with type 2 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (A1C) > 7%, blood pressure (BP) > 130/80 mmHg, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 100mg/dl (2.59 mmol/l) in the previous 6 months was conducted. The VA MEDIC-E intervention consisted of 4 weekly group sessions followed by 5 monthly booster group sessions. Each 2-hour session included 1 hour of multidisciplinary diabetes specific healthy lifestyle education and 1 hour of pharmacotherapeutic interventions performed by a clinical pharmacist. Evaluation measures included lab values of A1C, LDL cholesterol, BP, and goal attainment of these values, and diabetes self-care behavior questionnaires at 6 months.

Results

The randomization groups were similar at baseline in all cardiovascular risk factors except for LDL, which was significantly lower in the MEDIC-E arm. At 6 months, significant improvements from baseline were found in the intervention arm for exercise, foot care, and goal attainment of A1C, LDL-C, and BP but not in the control arm.

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that the pharmacist-led group intervention program for 6 months was an efficacious and sustainable collaborative care approach to managing diabetes and reducing associated cardiovascular risk.

Purpose

To examine accessibility, availability, and quality of diabetes self-management education (DSME) for uninsured adults or those utilizing Medicaid in a community with a high poverty rate.

Methods

A descriptive needs assessment was conducted in 8 health care agencies serving the uninsured. Face-to-face audiotaped interviews were conducted with 22 health care providers, educators, and administrators to capture descriptive characteristics about clinical care, DSME, continuity of care, and organizational function.

Results

Twenty-nine percent of adults with diabetes were reported to be uninsured or utilizing Medicaid in these settings. Only 4% of adults received the American Diabetes Association’s DSME standards of care. At 5 agencies, there was no direct access to DSME. Uninsured individuals had access to 2 programs; individuals utilizing Medicaid had access to 1 program. Certified diabetes educators were available at only 3 agencies. There were DSME programs that adhered to recommended guidelines but limited availability for these adults. The majority of education (86%) was limited to clinical encounters with providers, which were infrequent and variable in duration. Time spent on education ranged from 2 to 120 minutes depending on agency type. Education topics addressed by providers varied by agency.

Conclusions

Findings of this study suggest that adults who are utilizing Medicaid or are uninsured do not get the amount, type, or quality of DSME needed to sustain successful self-management. Limited availability and inadequate access to quality DSME place vulnerable adults at increased risk for devastating and costly complications despite the known benefits.