The authors examine the role of Iraq as a campaign issue in the 2006 midterm elections, analyzing more than 400 television advertisements produced by ninety-four candidates in forty-seven competitive races for the U.S. House of Representatives. Generally, the authors find that the issue of the war was not as central an element of candidate appeals as the conventional wisdom and media storyline leading up to Election Day implied. On the issue of Iraq, as well as other issues central to 2006, the authors find evidence that challengers pursued different issue strategies than either incumbents or open-seat candidates of the same party.
Abbe, Owen G., Jay Goodliffe, Paul S. Herrnson, and Kelly D. Patterson .2003. Agenda setting in congressional elections: The impact of issues and campaigns on voting behavior. Political Research Quarterly56:419-30.
2.
Abramowitz, Michael.2007. Debate over Iraq pullout aside, Bush needs a war spending bill. Washington Post, March 22, A06.
3.
Aldrich, John, John L. Sullivan, and Eugene Borgida.1989. Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates waltz before a blind audience?American Political Science Review83:123-42.
4.
Aldrich, John H., Christopher Gelpi, Peter Feaver, Jason Reifler, and Kristin Thompson Sharp.2006. Foreign policy and the electoral connection. Annual Review of Political Science9:477-502.
5.
Balz, Dan, and Chris Cillizza.2006. Handful of races may tip control of Congress. Washington Post, February 6, A1.
6.
Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder.2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis14:63-82.
7.
Carter, Ralph G., James M. Scott, and Charles M. Rowling .2004. Setting a course: Congressional foreign policy entrepreneurs in post-World War II US foreign policy. International Studies Perspectives5:278-99.
8.
Congressional districts in the 2000s. 2003. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
9.
Damore, David F.2004. The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns . Political Research Quarterly57:391-97.
10.
Erickson, Robert S., and Thomas R. Palfrey .2000. Equilibria in campaign spending games: Theory and data. American Political Science Review94:595-609.
11.
Freedman, Paul, Michael Franz, and Kenneth Goldstein .2004. Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science48:723-41.
12.
Friedenberg, Robert V.1997. Communication consultants in political campaigns: Ballot box warriors. Westport, CT: Praeger .
13.
Herrnson, Paul S.2004. Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington . 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
14.
Herrnson, Paul S., and Kelly D. Patterson .2000. Agenda setting and campaign advertising in congressional elections. In Crowded airwaves: Political advertising in elections, ed. James A. Thurber, Candice J. Nelson, and David A. Dulio.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15.
Holbert, R. Lance, William L. Benoit, Glenn J. Hansen, and Wei-Chun Wen .2002. The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry. Communication Monographs69:296-310.
16.
Hurwitz, John, and Mark Peffley.1987. The means and ends of foreign policy as determinants of presidential support. American Journal of Political Science31:236-58.
17.
Jacobson, Gary C.2007. The war, the president, and the 2006 midterm congressional elections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 12-15.
18.
Magleby, David B., and Kelly D. Patterson, eds. 2008. The battle for Congress: Iraq, scandal, and campaign finance in the 2006 election. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
19.
Medvic, Stephen K.2001. Political consultants in U.S. congressional elections . Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
20.
Nincic, Miroslav.1990. US Soviet policy and the electoral connection. World Politics42 (3): 370-96.
21.
Nincic, Miroslav, and Barbara Hinckley .1991. Foreign policy and the evaluation of presidential candidates. Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (2): 333-55.
22.
Petrocik, John R.1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40:825-50.
23.
Pfau, Michael, R. Lance Holbert, Erin Alison Szabo, and Kelly Kaminski.2002. Issue-advocacy versus candidate advertising: Effects on candidate preferences and democratic process. Journal of Communication52:301-15.
24.
Prior, Markus.2001. Weighted content analysis of political advertisements . Political Communication18:335-45.
25.
Quandt, William B.1986. The electoral cycle and the conduct of foreign policy . Political Science Quarterly101:825-37.
26.
Scott, James M.1997. In the loop: Congressional influence in American foreign policy. Journal of Political and Military Sociology25:47-76.
27.
Scott, James M., and Ralph G. Carter .2002. Acting on the hill: Congressional assertiveness in US foreign policy. Congress and the Presidency29:151-70.
28.
Sides, John M.2006. The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science36:407-36.
29.
---. 2007. The consequences of campaign agendas. American Politics Research35:465-88.
30.
Spiliotes, Constantine J., and Lynn Vavreck.2002. Campaign advertising: Partisan convergence or divergence?Journal of Politics64:249-61.
31.
Sulkin, Tracy, and Jillian Evans.2006. Dynamics of diffusion: Aggregate patterns in congressional campaign agendas. American Politics Research34:505-34.
32.
Sulkin, Tracy, Cortney M. Moriarty, and Veronica Hefner .2007. Congressional candidates' issue agendas on- and off-line. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12:63-79.
33.
Toner, Robin.2006. A loud message for Bush. New York Times , November 8, A1.
34.
---. 2007. Democrats unite around an Iraq plan of their own. New York Times, March 23, A6.
35.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L. Hutchings, and Dmitri Williams .2004. The impact of political advertising on knowledge, Internet information seeking, and candidate preference. Journal of Communication52 (4): 337-54.
