
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal


These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them in your inservice training programs.
Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the USP Medication Errors Reporting Program (MERP), which is presented in cooperation with the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. If you have encountered medication errors and would like to report them, you may call USP toll-free, 24 hours a day, at 800-233-7767 (800-23-ERROR).
Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers' names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below.
Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported through the ISMP (www.ismp.org) or USP (www.usp.org) Web sites or communicated directly to ISMP by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE or via E-mail at
The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discuss methods of prevention, and promote reporting of ADRs to the FDA's medWatch program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting preventable ADR to medWatch, please consider sharing the account with our readers.
The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy heightens the requirement that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column will review various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy. It will also serve as a review of various agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.
The elimination of dosing errors related to chemotherapy administration remains an elusive goal. Computerized order entry reduces errors but is not widely used. One problem in implementing computer dose checking is the lack of standardized dose limits. We evaluated the dose limits set for chemotherapeutic agents by users of a computer order entry system.
Oncology practices from 82 sites using a computer order entry system submitted data via the Web to a central data warehouse on 280,047 drug administrations for 16,976 patients. Data were blinded to patient and site but included the diagnosis, age, chemotherapy regimens, dosages, and dose adjustments. Dose limits, set by users at each location, were assessed. For commonly used regimens, the range of customary doses was also assessed.
The mean dose limit was less than that for a body surface area (BSA) of 2.2 meter squared in 43/44 (98%) of the drugs dosed according to BSA. This user set dose limit was exceeded in only 3% of drug administrations.
In setting computerized dose limits, most oncologists use a dose limit below that for a BSA of 2.2 meters squared. This user set limiting dose was rarely exceeded, with 97% of dosages below the limits set in this computer order entry system.
In preparation for the complete decentralization of pharmacists at our institution, we were asked to create a user-friendly intervention program the pharmacists could use on the patient floors.
The current system was cumbersome; the paper-based system made it hard to retrieve meaningful data and many interventions were not being captured. We felt that personal digital assistants (PDAs), with a tailored intervention program developed with
This program has increased the documentation of clinical pharmacy services at our institution, while reaping the additional benefit of transferring our total cost avoidance and savings into additional full-time equivalent positions.
A number of technological advances are becoming incorporated into institutional pharmacy practice in order to reduce the frequency and severity of medication errors. One of these has great promise. They deal with intravenous (IV) medication safety systems, wherein customized drug software is interfaced with “intelligent” infusion pumps. This paper describes the implementation and initial evaluation of Hospira's
Each month, subscribers to
Through the cooperation of
This monthly feature will help readers keep current on new drugs, indications, dosage forms, and safety-related changes in labeling or use.
The next several Director's Forum articles will focus on core practices or competencies in hospital pharmacy practice. This series of articles will discuss the key fundamentals, resources, challenges, and opportunities associated with drug dispensing. Future core competency forums will include discussions on medication ordering, intravenous admixtures, data analysis, and regulatory requirements.
In Director's Forum, we hope to answer key questions that pharmacy directors face and provide others with information to foster growth in pharmacy leadership. The articles in this column will build on one another and, when put together, will serve as a “tool kit” to develop patient-centered pharmacy services in hospitals of all sizes. Examples of topics in future Director's Forums will include establishing clinical service priorities, justifying clinical pharmacist positions, implementing a patient safety program, and budgeting for patient-centered services.
Nutrition Support Pharmacist features issues pertinent to the practice of clinical pharmacy in the area of nutritional support. The column is edited by Dr. Roland Dickerson, Professor of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Memphis, TN. Address correspondence to Dr. Roland N. Dickerson, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 26 South Dunlap St., Memphis, TN 38163.
This article provides a summary of our approach to the nutritional management of the thermally injured patient. However, it must be pointed out that there are other alternative effective evidence-based approaches to managing this problematic patient population. There are numerous exceptions to the above outlined guidelines that the astute clinician must be able to identify. However, for the beginning reader, this approach will provide a sound foundation upon which to build their practice in the management of these difficult patients.
