
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them at your inservice training programs.
Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Medication Errors Reporting Program. Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers' names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below.
Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported directly to ISMP through the ISMP Web site (www.ismp.org), by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE, or via e-mail at
The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discuss methods of prevention, and promote reporting of ADRs to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) MedWatch program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting, preventable ADR to MedWatch, please consider sharing the account with our readers.
The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.
This

Pharmacists appear to be increasingly turning to outsourcing as an option for managing drug preparation tasks, especially for sterile products whose preparation may be time- and labor-intensive. Outsourcing requires that the pharmacy carefully consider exactly what is being outsourced and why. In most cases, outsourcing provides less protection from liability than many pharmacists believe. To understand the risks of the outsourcing and how to manage the potential liabilities, it is important to understand where compounding practices started and how outsourced compounding vendors originated. Even though various resources exist to guide the evaluation of compounding outsource vendors, key decision makers (eg, hospital administrators, directors of pharmacy, the most responsible pharmacist) have no way to truly gauge the quality of outsourced compounding vendors unless they are properly regulated and the rules and regulations are clearly stated and available for review. Pharmacists should be prepared to investigate a potential outsource vendor and critically review their facilities, procedures, and documentation to ensure that dose preparation is properly performed and controlled. This article presents key performance quality indicators to review during a site visit to vet a possible outsourcing partner.
In 2006, the Institute of Medicine proposed initiatives to decrease medication errors using hospital monitoring systems for adverse event (AE) surveillance. Serendipitously, several poison center clinicians noticed a trend of inadvertent oral ingestions involving formoterol fumarate and tiotropium bromide. Each product is packaged in capsules for insertion into special pulmonary inhaler devices for chronic pulmonary disease. The National Poison Data System (NPDS) is a near real-time data and surveillance system capable of tracking AEs. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of NPDS to analyze outpatient AEs, employing formoterol and tiotropium ingestions as a model.
Retrospective review of NPDS data for formoterol and tiotropium mistaken oral ingestions (MOI) (2001–2007). Inclusion criteria were age over 6 years, exposures, all administration routes, all reasons, incorrect dosing route, and all medical outcomes. Primary outcome measures were number of MOI cases and demographics of at-risk patients.
There were 3,919 formoterol and 18,096 tiotropium cases that met inclusion criteria. MOI cases with minor or moderate outcomes were formoterol 82 (2.2%) and tiotropium 131 (0.8%). Neither drug had a major medical outcome or death. Mean age and gender were similar for both medications. MOI was more common among female patients. Health care facility MOIs accounted for 19 (0.5%) formoterol and 35 (0.2%) tiotropium cases. From 2005 to 2007, formoterol and tiotropium cases accounted for 35% to 45% of all NPDS-tracked AEs.
NPDS data analysis revealed the magnitude of AEs for capsule-shaped medications for inhaler use was more common than previously identified.
The emergent nature of anaphylaxis creates an environment of heightened risk for epinephrine medication misadventures that may occur in any health care setting. Literature to date has focused on the immediate adverse outcomes associated with epinephrine dosing and administration errors, with a lack of data available on prolonged consequences.
We present a unique case of refractory hypotension associated with the administration of high-dose epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis that prompted a comprehensive safety evaluation and implementation of a process improvement plan for all patients experiencing an anaphylactic reaction in our institution.
A 29-year-old female presented to an immediate care facility for treatment of anaphylaxis including 2 doses of epinephrine 1 mg (1:1000) intramuscularly. The patient was subsequently transported to our adult emergency department and developed isolated hypotension refractory to fluid resuscitation. The patient was then admitted to the medical intensive care unit with a diagnosis of epinephrine toxicity. The prolonged hypotensive response seen in this patient is believed to be a result of residual stimulation of the more sensitive beta receptors by high doses of epinephrine administered to the patient, resulting in a prolonged vasodilatory response.
Epinephrine is a high-alert medication used for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Proactive evaluation of current processes among institutions is recommended in order to minimize dosing and administration errors with epinephrine as these errors can lead to substantial harm to patients.
Each month, subscribers to
Through the cooperation of
This monthly feature will help readers keep current on new drugs, new indications, dosage forms, and safety-related changes in labeling or use. Efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this information; however, if there are any questions, please let me know at
As you might expect, the vast majority of pharmacists are “packing” a smartphone. Most even sleep near their device (within about 3 feet). Gone are the days when a separate personal digital assistant (PDA) and a pager supplemented a clunky cell phone on our waists or in our purses. We are able to keep an information appliance on hand 24/7. In this installment, we discuss the ways we most commonly use our smartphones.
The